Understanding your attachment style is one of the most powerful things you can do for your relationship life
Ever wondered why you do that thing — the thing where you push people away right when they're getting close? Or that other thing, where the moment someone seems less interested, you become desperately, embarrassingly interested in them? Or why you seem to navigate relationships so calmly while everyone around you is in a constant state of emotional emergency?
Attachment theory has an explanation. And it's one of those explanations that, once you've heard it, you can't un-hear it.
Attachment theory was developed by British psychiatrist John Bowlby in the 1960s and expanded by developmental psychologist Mary Ainsworth through a series of experiments known as the "Strange Situation." The core idea: the way we learn to relate to our earliest caregivers creates a template — an internal working model — that shapes how we expect relationships to work for the rest of our lives.
Ainsworth's research identified three primary attachment patterns in children. Decades of subsequent research, led by researchers including Phillip Shaver and Cindy Hazan, demonstrated that these same patterns show up — in recognisably similar form — in adult romantic relationships.
Securely attached people experienced caregivers who were consistently responsive — present when needed, attuned to emotional signals, reliable. As adults, they tend to be comfortable with both intimacy and independence. They trust that partners will be there for them, communicate needs directly, and don't spiral when conflict or distance arises. They're not immune to relationship difficulties, but they tend to approach them with more equanimity.
Roughly 50-60% of people in Western populations are classified as securely attached — which means around half of the people you date are probably bringing this relatively healthy template to the relationship.
Anxiously attached people experienced caregiving that was inconsistent — sometimes warm and responsive, sometimes not. The unpredictability meant they could never fully relax into the relationship. The result in adulthood: a hypervigilance to relationship cues, an intense fear of abandonment, and a tendency to seek frequent reassurance.
In practice, this looks like reading a lot into a delayed text reply. Interpreting a partner's bad mood as evidence of rejection. Oscillating between "everything's fine" and "everything is ending." Needing regular reassurance even when things are going well. This isn't manipulation or neediness as a character flaw — it's a nervous system that learned to treat inconsistency as threat.
Avoidantly attached people experienced caregivers who were emotionally distant, dismissive of emotional needs, or who rewarded self-sufficiency over vulnerability. The adaptation: turn the attachment system down. Stop needing too much. Find safety in independence rather than connection.
As adults, avoidantly attached people tend to feel uncomfortable with intimacy, withdraw when partners get too close, and experience emotional closeness as a loss of autonomy. They may genuinely want connection — but when they get it, something in them recoils. This often looks like emotional unavailability or commitment resistance, but it's more accurately described as a deep ambivalence about closeness.
Here's where it gets particularly illuminating: anxious and avoidant styles are disproportionately attracted to each other, and their relationship dynamic is a predictable cycle that can run for years without resolution.
The anxiously attached person seeks closeness and reassurance. The avoidantly attached person withdraws when the pressure for closeness increases. The anxious person pursues harder in response to the withdrawal. The avoidant withdraws further. Around and around they go, each triggering the other's deepest attachment wound.
It's not that these relationships are loveless. Often the opposite is true. But without understanding what's driving the dynamic, the cycle simply continues — because both people are responding to their own attachment fears rather than to each other.
This is the part that often gets buried, but it's arguably the most important: attachment styles are not fixed personality traits. They're learned patterns, and learned patterns can be updated.
Research shows that attachment styles can shift over time — through therapy, through consistently positive relationship experiences, and through the kind of earned security that comes from a relationship with a securely attached partner. The brain is plastic. The template you developed in early childhood is not the template you're stuck with forever.
Awareness alone creates distance from the pattern. When you can name what's happening — "I'm having an anxious response right now because my partner hasn't texted back" — you're no longer entirely inside the pattern. You've created a small space between the trigger and the behaviour, and in that space lives choice.
Understanding attachment theory isn't a replacement for relationship work. But it does give you two things that are genuinely valuable.
First, it reduces self-blame. The patterns you've developed weren't your fault. They were adaptations to the environments you grew up in. Understanding that doesn't eliminate responsibility for your behaviour, but it does reframe it in a way that makes change feel more possible.
Second, it gives you a map. When you understand why you're doing the thing you're doing — and why your partner might be doing their thing — you have something to work with. You can start to respond instead of react. You can name what you need. You can understand, rather than catastrophise, what's happening when conflict arises.
That map might be the most useful thing you bring to any relationship you're in.
The Love Guide's Healthy Relationships chapter covers attachment science in depth — including how to identify your own style, understand your partner's, and build towards earned security.
Get The Love Guide — $935 chapters · 60-day guarantee